(in Polish)
E. Roguska,
Volume 546: Issue 2
Pages 21-24
Accepted for publication: 29.01.2018
In the article themeans of risk analysis were discussed. The method of fuzzy risk matrix was described. The main idea of the fuzzy risk matrix is the fuzzyfication of frequency, consequence and risk categories. The fuzzy sets are formed according to the fuzzy sets principle using the knowledge base. Such fuzzyfication aims at better modelling of subjective data elicited from experts. For the purpose of the risk matrix for underground construction projects, the membership functions basing in the density functions of a normal distribution was used. Then, the example of the risk analysis of the construction of C12 „Nowy Swiat – Uniwersytet” metro station inWarsaw is given.
Keywords: risk analysis; risk management; fuzzy risk matrix
Keywords: risk analysis; risk management; fuzzy risk matrix
- Abgarowicz Grzegorz, Anna Banulska, Inga Abgarowicz, Jan Gołębiewski, Piotr Guzewski, Maria Kędzierska, Daniel Małozięć i in. 2015. Zarządzanie Ryzykiem. Przegląd Wybranych Metodyk. Wydawnictwo Centrum Naukowo-Badawczego Ochrony Przeciwpożarowej im. Józefa Tuliszkowskiego Państwowego Instytutu Badawczego. DOI: 10.17381/2015.1.
- A code of practice for risk management of tunnel works. 2012.
- Ahn Mark, William D. Falloon. 1991. Strategic Risk Management: How Global Corporations Manage Financial Risk for Competitive Advantage.
- British Tunnelling Society. 2003. „The Joint Code of Practice for RiskManagement of Tunnel Works.” America.
- Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá, Saad S. H.Al-Jibouri, Johannes I. M. Halman, Wim van de Linde, Frank Kaalberg. „Using Prior Risk-Related Knowledge to Support Risk Management Decisions: Lessons Learnt from a Tunneling Project.” Risk Analysis 34, no. 10: 1923 – 43. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12213.
- Eskesen, Søren Degn, Per Tengborg, Jørgen Kampmann, Trine Holst Veicherts. 2004. „Guidelines for Tunnelling Risk Management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2004.01.001.
- Hammond Kenneth R., Thomas R. Stewart, Berndt Brehmer, Derick O. Steinmann. 1975. „Social judgment theory.” In Human Judgement and Decision Processes. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397250-7.50016-7.
- Kynn Mary. 2008. „The Heuristics and Biases” Bias in Expert Elicitation.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00499.x.
- Management, Project Risk. 2009. „ISO 31000: The New Global Risk Management Standard.”
- „Międzynarodowe Standardy Profesjonalnej Praktyki Audytu Wewnętrznego.” Accessed February 4, 2018. http://www.audyt.com/storage/pdf/standardy/standardy_kontroli_finansowej2.pdf.
- Mitew-Czajewska Monika. 2014. „Numerical Analysis of a 36 M Deep Diaphragm Wall – Parametric Study”.
- Muir Wood Alan. 2000. Tunnelling. Spon Press. DOI: 10.4324/ 9780203477663.
- Munich Re. 2006. „The Code of Practice for Risk Management of Tunnel Works Future Tunnelling Insurance from the Insurers” Point of View.” Ita Wtc.
- Roguska Emilia, Jerzy Lejk. 2015. „Fuzzy Risk Matrix as a Risk Assessment Method – a Case Study.” In Ee Tunnel. Promoting Tunnelling in SER, edited by D. Kolić, 796–97. ITAAITES (http://repo.bg.pw.edu.pl/index.php /en/r#/info.seam?id=WUTc20c41cf56c64d428f b01f2729ad719d&lang=en#.WndHjXbiaUk).
- Stille H. 2017. „Geological Uncertainties in Tunnelling-Risk Assessment and Quality Assurance.” ITA-AITESWorld Tunnel Congress. Diva- -Portal. org. Accessed (http://www.diva-portal. org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1128743).
- Sousa Rita L. 2010. „Risk Analysis for Tunneling Projects.” Environmental Engineering.
- Tversky Amos, Daniel Kahneman. 1974. „Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science (1).
- mgr inż. Emilia Roguska Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
mgr inż. Emilia Roguska
Full paper is available at Publisher house SIGMA-NOT Sp. z o.o. webpage