Head office overheads – overview of contractors’ claims estimation methods due to delays

openaccess, Vol. 604 (12) 2022 / wtorek, 27 grudnia, 2022

(Open Access)

DOI: 10.15199/33.2022.12.26

Juszczyk Michał. 2022. Head office overheads – overview of contractors’ claims estimation methods due to delays. Volume 604. Issue 12. Pages 98-100. Article in PDF file

Accepted for publication: 26.10.2022 r.

The aimof the paper is to review themethods allowing to determinate contractors claims due to delays in construction works for which the client is responsible. Focuses on the specific type of costs – namely head office overheads in construction companies. Selectedmethods in the formof calculation formulas are discussed. Compared in terms of their assumptions and principles as well as input data necessary for calculations. Additionally the results of claims computations are also compared on the basis of calculation example. The analysis of the methods principles and the computations results revealed discrepancies between the discussed methods.
  1. Balicka A. Analiza kosztów specjalistycznych robót budowlanych, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. 2017; https://doi. org/10.15611/pn. 2017.472.01.
  2. Leśniak A, Plebankiewicz E, Zima K. Wpływ założeń kalkulacyjnych na wynik oszacowania kosztów robót budowlanych. Czasopismo Techniczne. Budownictwo. 2012; 109 (3-B): 75 – 87.
  3. Ibbs W, Baker B, Burckhardt F. Process model for identifying and computing allowable home office overhead cost claims, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction. 2015; https://doi. org/10.1061/(ASCE) LA. 1943-4170.0000164.
  4. Davis R, Watson P. The utilization of formulae in overhead and profit claims, w: Hughes,W. (red.), 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool JohnMoores University, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 1999; 2: 645 – 653.
  5. Jayalath C. A Perception Survey On Unabsorbed Head Office Overhead Recovery Methodologies. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications. 2019; 3 (7): 117 – 120.
  6. Lowe S, Bielek R, BurnhamR. Compensation for Contractors’Home Office Overhead, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice. 2003; vol. 315, Transportation Research Board
  7. Nagata M.F. Home Office Overhead – Which Formula ShouldYouUse? Source. 2020; 8: 15 – 23.
  8. Projekt procedury uznawania kosztów zarządu i administracji Wykonawcy w przedłużonym Czasie na Ukończenie, rewizja 04 z 07.02.2014 r., Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad.
  9. Anysz H. The profit as in-company evaluation of the construction site effectiveness. w MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700009.
dr hab. inż. Michał Juszczyk, Politechnika Krakowska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej ORCID: 0000-0002-8353-9823

dr hab. inż. Michał Juszczyk, Politechnika Krakowska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej ORCID: 0000-0002-8353-9823


Full paper:

DOI: 10.15199/33.2022.12.26

Article in PDF file