Effective implementation of Intelligent Transport Systems – analysis of methodology based on the Code of Good Practice for ITS Implementation

openaccess, Vol. 638 (10) 2025 / niedziela, 26 października, 2025

Efektywne wdrażanie Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych – analiza metodyki na podstawie Kodeksu Dobrych Praktyk Wdrażania ITS

(Open Access)

DOI: 10.15199/33.2025.10.10

citation/cytuj: Oskarbski J., Kamiński T., Kołkowski M., Kamińska E. Effective implementation of Intelligent Transport Systems – analysis of methodology based on the Code of Good Practice for ITS Implementation. Materiały Budowlane. 2025. Volume 638. Issue 10. Pages 782-92. DOI: 10.15199/33.2025.10.10

The aim of this article is to analyse the implementation process of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) proposed in the “Best Practice Code for Effective Implementation of Intelligent Transportation Systems”. Research results indicate that the comprehensive approach suggested in the methodology described in the Code, which considers technical, organisational and social aspects, is a key success factor for implementing ITS projects. Analysis of individual stages of the implementation process confirms that an integrated approach encompassing planning, design and subsequent system maintenance significantly increases the chances of successful implementation, minimises the risk of failures and maximises benefits from investments in modern transportation solutions.

W artykule przeanalizowano proces wdrażania Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych (ITS) zgodnie z propozycjami zawartymi w „Kodeksie Dobrych Praktyk dla Efektywnego Wdrażania Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych”. Wyniki badań wskazują, że kompleksowe podejście przedstawione w metodologii Kodeksu, uwzględniające aspekty techniczne, organizacyjne i społeczne, stanowi kluczowy czynnik sukcesu w realizacji projektów ITS. Analiza poszczególnych etapów procesu wdrażania potwierdza, że zintegrowane podejście obejmujące planowanie, projektowanie oraz późniejsze utrzymanie systemu znacznie zwiększa szanse powodzenia wdrożenia, minimalizuje ryzyko niepowodzenia i maksymalizuje korzyści wynikające z inwestycji w nowoczesne rozwiązania transportowe.
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS); ITS implementation methodology; ITS architecture; cybersecurity

Inteligentne Systemy Transportowe (ITS); metodyka wdrażania ITS; architektura ITS; bezpieczeństwo informatyczne
  1. Garg T, Kaur G. A Systematic Review on Intelligent Transport Systems. Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering 2023, 2, 175–188, doi: 10.47852/bonviewJCCE2202245.
  2. Oskarbski J, Kamiński T, Kyamakya K, Chedjou JC, Żarski K, Pędzierska M. Assessment of the Speed Management Impact on Road Traffic Safety on the Sections of Motorways and Expressways Using Simulation Methods. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020, 20, 1–33, doi: 10.3390/s20185057.
  3.  Oskarbski J, Kaszubowski D. Applying a Mesoscopic Transport Model to Analyse the Effects of Urban Freight Regulatory Measures on Transport Emissions-an Assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2018, 10, doi: 10.3390/su10072515.
  4.  Zulkarnain, Putri TD. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): A Systematic Review Using a Natural Language Processing (NLP) Approach. Heliyon 2021, 7, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08615.
  5.  Kamiński T, Kołkowski M, Oskarbski J, Okoń T, Adamczyk W, Kruczek A, Bernard B. KODEKS DOBRYCH PRAKTYK Efektywnego Wdrażania Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych – Wydanie 2024; 2024;
  6.  Stoica R, Brouse P. IT Project Failure: A Proposed Four-Phased Adaptive Multi-Method Approach. Procedia Comput Sci 2013, 16, 728–736, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.076.
  7.  Alfaadel F, Alawairdhi M, Al-Zyoud M. Success and Failure of IT Projects: A Study in Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 012, Proceedings of the 11th Wseas International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science; WSEAS, 2012.
  8. Alnhari AA, Quresh R. Unified External Stakeholder Engagement and Requirements Strategy. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 2024, 15, 01–15, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2024.15501.
  9.  Abolghasemi M, Al-Mhdawi MKS, Rahimian F, Qazi A. Exploring the Nexus of Stakeholder Management, Project Performance and Stakeholder Satisfaction in Malaysian Residential Building Projects: A PLS-SEM Approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2024, doi: doi. org/10.1108/ECAM-03‒2024‒0367.
  10.  https://Frame-Online.Eu/Frame-Architecture/.
  11.  I. Meneguette RE. De Grande R, AF Loureiro, A. Intelligent Transport System in Smart Cities; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; ISBN 978‒3‒319‒93331‒3.
  12.  Chapman RE. Inadequate Interoperability: A Closer Look at the Costs. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC 2005; Ferrara (Italy), September 11 2005.
  13.  Maciel RSP, Valle PH, Santos KS, Nakagawa EY. Systems Interoperability Types: A Tertiary Study. ACM Comput. Surv. 2024, 56, doi: doi. org/10.1145/3659098.
  14. Bělinová Z, Bureš P. Study of Standards and National Architectures within the E-FRAME Project. Archives of Transport System Telematics 2009, 2, 23–27.
  15.  Dias B, Santos A, Costa A, Ribeiro B, Gonçalves F, Macedo J, João Nicolau M, Gama, O, Sousa S. Agnostic and Modular Architecture for the Development of Cooperative ITS Applications. Journal of Communications Software and Systems 2018, 14, 218–227, doi: 10.24138/jcomss.v14i3.550.
  16.  Oskarbski J, Biszko K, Kaszubowski D. YRAM Monitoring Guidance User Manual; 2024;
  17.  Villazón CC, Pinilla LS, Olaso JRO, Gandarias NT, de Lacalle NL. Identification of Key Performance Indicators in Project-Based Organisations through the Lean Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2020, 12, doi: 10.3390/su12155977.
  18.  Djordjevic B, Krmac E. Key performance indicators for measuring the impacts of ITS on transport. In Proceedings of the ISEP 2016; Cracow, 2016.
  19. Iriarte C, Bayona S. It Projects Success Factors: A Literature Review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management 2020, 8, 49–78.
  20.  Radhakrishnan A, Davis JS, David D. Examining the Critical Success Factors in IT Projects: A Two-Panel Delphi Study. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management 2022, 13, doi: 10.4018/IJITPM.290423.
  21.  Salazar-Cabrera R, Pachon A. Methodology for Design of an Intelligent Transport System (ITS) Architecture for Intermediate Colombian City. INGENIERÍA Y COMPETITIVIDAD 2019, 21, doi: 10.25100/iyc.v21i1.7654.
  22.  Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego 2010/40/UE z 7 lipca 2010 r. w Sprawie Ram Wdrażania Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych w Obszarze Transportu Drogowego Oraz Interfejsów z Innymi Rodzajami Transportu;
  23.  Mehandjiev N, Grefen P, Stalker ID, Eshuis R, Fessl K, Weichhart G. Designing a Modular Infrastructure for Exploratory Integration of Interoperability Approaches. In Proceedings of the Enterprise Interoperability; Doumeingts, G., Müller, J., Morel, G., Vallespir, B., Eds, Springer, London, 2007; pp. 427–437.
  24.  Farooq M, Afraz N, Golpayegani F. An Adaptive System Architecture for Multimodal Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2024, doi: https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08817Focustolearnmore.
  25. Rangarajan K, Long S, Tobias A, Keister M. The Role of Stakeholder Engagement in the Development of Sustainable Rail Infrastructure Systems. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2013, 7, 106–113, doi: 10.1016/j. rtbm.2013.03.007.
  26. Morrissett A, Eini R, Zaman M, Zohrabi N, Abdelwahed S. A Physical Testbed for Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2019, doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.1907.12899.
  27.  Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2023/2661 z 22 listopada 2023 r. w Sprawie Zmiany Dyrektywy 2010/40/UE w Sprawie Ram Wdrażania Inteligentnych Systemów Transportowych w Obszarze Transportu Drogowego Oraz Interfejsów z Innymi Rodzajami Transportu.
  28.  Aifantopoulou G, Mylonas C, Dolianitis A, Stamelou A, Psonis V, Mitsakis E. National Access Points for Intelligent Transport Systems Data: From Conceptualization to Benefits Recognition and Exploitation. 2020, doi: doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.12036.
  29.  Mandžuka B, Vidović K, Vujić M, Alexopoulos C. The Importance Of Open Data Accessibility For Multimodal Travel Improvement*. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 2022, 20, 136–148, doi: 10.7906/ indecs.20.2.6.
  30. Seraj F. Smart Transport Infrastructure Maintenance: A Smart-Contract Blockchain Approach. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.20431.
  31.  Hassn HAH, Ismail A, Borhan MN, Syamsunur D. The Impact of Intelligent Transport System Quality: Drivers’ Acceptance Perspective. International Journal of Technology 2016, 7, 553–561, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2578.
  32. Hühn O, Breitbarth C. Performance Modeling for SLA-Compliant but Cost-Effective IT-Service Provisioning. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Workshop on Information Technologies & Systems (WITS), Montreal, Canada, 2007; Chari, K., Kumar, A., Eds, Montreal, 2007.
  33.  Mecheva T, Kakanakov N. Cybersecurity in Intelligent Transportation Systems. Computers 2020, 9, 1–12, doi: 10.3390/computers9040083.
  34.  Sunday Ebenezer Aluko Cybersecurity and Defense in Intelligent Transportation Systems. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences 2024; 13: 871–879, DOI: 10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.1.0469.
  35. Krause C, Anderson J, Shain K, Nana L, Mazzone T, McNaught S, Jackson M. Cybersecurity and Intelligent Transportation Systems A Best Practice Guide; 2019;
  36. Shaaban K, Elamin M, Alsoub M. Intelligent Transportation Systems in a Developing Country: Benefits and Challenges of Implementation. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Procedia; Elsevier B.V., 2021; Vol. 55, pp. 1373–1380.
  37.  Wang Y, Ye S, Yang F, Zuo J, Rameezdeen R. How Information Gaining Affects Public Acceptance in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: A Comparative Case Study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2022, 97, DOI: 10.1016/j. eiar.2022.106915.
dr hab. inż. Jacek Oskarbski, prof. uczelni, Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Środowiska
ORCID: 0000-0003-0651-4902
dr hab. inż. Tomasz Kamiński, Instytut Badawczy Dróg i Mostów, Zakład Systemów Zarządzania i Telematyki
ORCID: 0000-0002-6695-4136
mgr inż. Mariusz Kołkowski, Sprint S.A.
dr inż. Ewa Kamińska, Instytut Badawczy Dróg i Mostów, Zakład Systemów Zarządzania i Telematyki
ORCID: 0000-0002-6695-4136

dr hab. inż. Jacek Oskarbski, prof. uczelni, Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Środowiska
ORCID: 0000-0003-0651-4902

Correspondence address: jacek.oskarbski@pg.edu.pl

Full paper:

DOI: 10.15199/33.2025.10.10

Article in PDF file

Received: 16.06.2025 / Artykuł wpłynął do redakcji: 16.06.2025 r.
Revised: 28.07.2025 / Otrzymano poprawiony po recenzjach: 28.07.2025 r.
Published: 23.10.2025 / Opublikowano: 23.10.2025 r.