Formal and technological aspects of additively manufactured architecture in the light of geometric parameters of selected objects


openaccess, Vol. 620 (4) 2024 / wtorek, 23 kwietnia, 2024

(Open Access)

DOI: 10.15199/33.2024.04.04

Koszewski Krzysztof, Strzał Marcin. 2024. Formal and technological aspects of additively manufactured architecture in the light of geometric parameters of selected objects. Volume 620. Issue 4. Pages 20-26. Article in PDF file

Accepted for publication: 20.03.2024 r.

The article presents the results of analyses of the hitherto unexplored relationship between an artifact and itsmanufacturing tool in architecture and additive methods (AM). The purpose of the study was to identify and interpret these relationships. For this purpose, the authors examined the characteristics of selected 82 realizations created between 2004 and 2021. In the research, two author's indicators were introduced: scale (WS) and detail (WD). The analyses conducted indicate a close relationship between design methods and manufacturing technology.
  1. Ingarden R. O dziele architektury w: Studia z estetyki. Tom drugi. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 1958. pp. 115–161.
  2. Toker F. Gothic Architecture by Remote Control: An Illustrated Building Contract of 1340. Art Bulletin. 1985 vol. 67, no. 1. pp. 67–95.
  3. Guzicki W. Geometria mas werków gotyckich w: Biblioteczka Stowarzyszenia na Rzecz Edukacji Matematycznej, no. 3. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Szkolne Omega, 2011.
  4. Hersey GL. Architecture and geometry in the age of the Baroque. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
  5. Duby G. The age of the cathedrals: art and society, 980-1420. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
  6. Delorme P. Le Premier tome de l’Architecture de Philibert de L’Orme..., Lyon, 1567. [Online]. http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver. pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10195337-1[dostęp: 08.09.2023].
  7. Semper G. The four elements of architecture and other writings w: RES monographs in anthropology and aesthetics. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  8. Frampton K. Studies in Tectonic Culture: the poetics of constriction in nineteenth and twentienth century architecture. Cambridge, Mass: M. I. T. Press, 2001.
  9. Ingold T.Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London; New York: Routledge, 2013.
  10. Evans R. Architectural Projection w: Architecture and its image: four centuries of architectural representation: works fromthe collection of the Canadian Centre for Architecture, red. Blau, E., Evans, R. i Kaufman, E., Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture. 1989, pp. 19–35.
  11. Mitchell WJ, Mc Cullough M. Digital design media, 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995.
  12.  Koszewski K. File-to-factory – nowe perspektywy w warsztacie architekta. Materiały Budowlane. 2010; 460: 33 – 36.
  13.  Hansmeyer M. Digital Grotesque II. https://www.michael-hansmeyer. com/digital-grotesque-II. [dostęp 10.06.2023].
  14. Dillenburger B, Hansmeyer M. Printing Architecture: Castles Made Of Sand w: Fabricate 2014: Negotiating Design & Making, red. Gramazio F., Kohler M., Langenberg S., UCL Press. 2017. DOI: 10.2307/J.Ctt1tp3c5w.15.
dr hab. inż. arch. Krzysztof Koszewski, Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Architektury ORCID: 0000-0002-7907-746X
dr inż. arch. Marcin Strzała, Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Architektury ORCID: 0000-0003-4102-4730

dr hab. inż. arch. Krzysztof Koszewski, Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Architektury ORCID: 0000-0002-7907-746X

 krzysztof.koszewski@pw.edu.pl

Full paper:

DOI: 10.15199/33.2024.04.04

Article in PDF file