1. Wangler T et al. Digital Concrete: A Review. Cement and Concrete Research. 2019; 123: 105780.
2. Ivanova I et al. Comparison between methods for indirect assessment of buildability in fresh 3D printed mortar and concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2022; 156: 106764.
3.  Roussel N. Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cement and Concrete Research. 2018; 112: 76 – 85.
4. Perrot A et al. Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D- -printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct. 2016; 49 (4): 1213–20.
5.  Ding T et al. Mechanical behavior of 3Dprintedmortarwith recycled sand at early ages. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 248 (2005): 118654.
6.  Tao Y et al. Shape stability of 3D printable concrete with river and manufactured sand characterized by squeeze flow. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2022; 133: 104674.
7.  Li Z et al. Fresh and Hardened Properties of Extrusion-Based 3D-Printed Cementitious Materials: A Review. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (14): 5628.
8.  Skibicki S et al. The effect of interlayer adhesion on stress distribution in 3D printed beam elements. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024; 87 (2): 109093.
9. Zbyszyński Wet al. Data image correlation analysis of the destruction process of 3D printable layered beams subjected to the 3-point bending process. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2023; 125 (03007): 103891.
10.  Alchaar AS et al. Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete in hot temperatures. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 266 (1): 120991.
11.  Luo S et al. Effects of interval time and interfacial agents on the mechanical characteristics of ultra-high toughnessnn cementitious composites under 3D-printed technology. Construction and Building Materials. 2023; 374 (8): 130936.
12.  Chen Y et al. Effect of curing methods during a long time gap between two printing sessions on the interlayer bonding of 3D printed cementitiousmaterials. Construction and BuildingMaterials. 2022; 332 (1): 127394.
13.  Skibicki S et al. Experimental Study of Hardened Young’s Modulus for 3D Printed Mortar. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14 (24).
14.  EN 1015-11:2020.Methods of test for mortar for masonry – Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar.
15.  Skibicki S et al. Potential of Reusing 3D Printed Concrete (3DPC) Fine Recycled Aggregates as a Strategy towards Decreasing Cement Content in 3DPC. Materials. 2024; 17 (11): 2580.
16.  Al-Noaimat YA et al. Recycled brick aggregates in one-part alkali-activated materials: Impact on 3D printing performance and material properties. Developments in the Built Environment. 2023; 16: 100248.
17.  EN 12390-6:2009. Testing hardened concrete – Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens.
18.  Wolfs RJM et al. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion. Cement and Concrete Research. 2019; 119: 132–40.
19.  Pan T et al. Interlayer bonding investigation of 3D printing cementitious materials with fluidity-retaining polycarboxylate superplasticizer and high-dispersion polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Construction and Building Materials 2022; 330 (5): 127151

dr inż. Szymon Skibicki, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Wydział Budownictwa i Inżynierii Środowiska
ORCID: 0000-0002-2918-7759

Corespondence address: szymon.skibicki@zut.edu.pl

Full paper:

DOI: 10.15199/33.2024.09.02

Article in PDF file